Boy, President Trump and Elon Musk sure are active, aren't they? They seem to want to bust the chops of every federal agency. And, you know, quite a few of them deserve busting. My understanding is that even the Pentagon is to come under deep scrutiny. Good; no one should be exempt.
I think a lot of the angst on the matter is the way in which particularly Elon Musk is handling the situation. He appears to be using a meat cleaver, simply hacking away. I'll admit myself that's fraught with difficulties. It absolutely creates uncertainty, and it affects people everywhere and to a greater degree than we might imagine. I do appreciate that. But if there's another way to trim the fat or to get rid of spending on stuff we shouldn't pay for, why hasn't it happened?
Mostly, there isn't the political will on anybody's part to examine Washington in depth and writ large and do something about it, even though few people argue nothing needs doing spending-wise. Further, so you think how Musk is doing it is messy? How messy will it get when things are piled up under minutiae in a Congressional committee? Because this I'll guarantee: what ifs and what nots will be thrown around and nothing will get done. If relying on Congress to, yes, actually do its job and tend to the purse is the answer, we appear to have been barking up a tree for decades now. As such, and arguably at the very least, someone else has to try.
There isn't that much money to cut? According to a Congressional Budget Office report from July 2024 there were 491 federal agencies which lacked Congressional authorization yet were budgeted at $516 billion dollars. So theoretically, that money should not have even been spent. That's about one-fourth of Trump's targeted cuts (his original aim was for $2 trillion per year) right there. All right, perhaps some of those agencies ought to be authorized. Then authorize them, because it strikes me as eminently reasonable that if you don't have formal approval to even exist you shouldn't get the money. But, again, political will. Something Congress sorely lacks.
Have I mentioned the Festivus Report issued in November 2024 by Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky? He cites One Trillion Dollars of waste at the taxpayers' expense. You know, important stuff like finding out if lonely rats (yes, rats) seek cocaine quicker than happy rats, to the tune of $419,000. Or $2.1 million for Paraguayan border security. You read that right. Or...you get the point. Even if some of the money Sen. Paul cites is justifiable, surely not all is worthwhile.
I don't see where this is even a liberal/conservative, Democrat/Republican issue. If you're either of the latter you should be working for budget cuts because you want smaller government. If you're of the formers, I would think you want sensible budgeting precisely to get more money for your other causes. We should all want fiscal responsibility, even if we're at cross purposes philosophically. So why don't we have it?
A-hem. Political will. At least Trump and Musk are actually trying to address the entire budget. Like it or not, they're doing something. And no one else is.