I can take criticism. Oh, I have my days where I don't want to hear it. But I do try to bull through that resistance and accept what critics tell me. I wouldn't be putting my writing 'out there' if I couldn't do that.
Still, reviewers are human, and themselves subject to be wrong. A recent critic of my book The Sublime to the Ridiculous: Family Lore is in that spot.
She gave the book three stars out of five because "It reads more like a blog, which the author indicates is the source material, and would work better as that."
Oh. Kay. First off, I don't 'indicate' that a blog is the source material, I say flat out in the preface that the book is made up of blog posts. That's called a compilation. Many books are compilations. It's a standard practice.
Second, she knocks a blog collection because it's a blog collection? I'm deprived two stars for that?
Sometimes I don't get people.
No comments:
Post a Comment